Methodology technical feasibility NbS 1
This map aims to showcase which areas are suitable for flood-based agriculture projects. Our methodology for analysing suitable areas for flood-based agriculture is based on two guiding principles:
-
The area is currently protected by a dike and is therefore disconnected from the flood plain.
-
The current biophysical conditions of an area are suitable for the specific agricultural practice.
Approach
The spatial potential of the selected NbS types is mapped by overlaying different geospatial datasets, like hydrologic, soil and climatic data. This provides a first high-level indication to the effective geographic scalability of NbS. The suitability for a specific NbS is, where possible, classified in 4 classes: highly suitable, moderately suitable, marginally suitable and not suitable.
The methodology applied for this study is derived from previous conducted studies by Royal HaskoningDHV for WWF on "Upscaling of Flood-Based Agriculture in Mekong Delta in Viet Nam" and for The World Bank Group on "Assessing Land Suitability, Water Management Conditions, and Climate Risks in the Mekong Delta Region (2021-2030), with an Outlook to 2050."
All suitability factors that are described below were classified into two categories, an area is either suitable or not suitable given that suitability factor. Should any of the factors render an area unsuitable, regardless of the scores from other factors, the area is automatically labelled as unsuitable for this NbS. Inundation depth further classifies an area in marginally, moderately or highly suitable for flood-based agriculture.
The suitability class - highly, moderately or marginally suitable, thus depends on two factors:
-
If the area is suitable given all suitability factors.
-
If an area is highly, moderately or marginally suitable given the inundation depth suitability factor.
Suitability components for Flood-based Agriculture
Soil Type
Certain types of flood-based agriculture requires specific soil conditions. For example, Melaleuca Forest is mostly suitable on the acid sulphate soils.
Inundation depth
Dikes will need to be modified to be able to let the floods in, but flooding depth is then determined by the depth that an area would naturally flood in absence of flood protection.
Flood protection
Existing flood protection system: Suitable areas should currently be safeguarded by dykes and are therefore disconnected from the river.
Salinity intrusion
Some agricultural/aquacultural activities are more vulnerable to salinity intrusion. For instance, Prawn (Giant freshwater prawn) exhibit low tolerance to saline conditions, whereas Melaleuca forests are more resilient to salinity.
Inundation Depth
The flood with an exceedance probability of 10% is used to determine the area classification related to inundation conditions. The classification of flood depth in the Mekong Delta is based on the experience in agricultural production and similar flood studied carryout by Southern Institute of Water Resources Research for the Mekong Delta. The following 5 classes have been identified within this classification:
-
No flooding
-
Low flood (inundation depth < 50cm)
-
Medium flood (inundation depths of 50-100 cm)
-
High flood (inundation depth 100 - 200 cm)
-
Very high flood (inundation depth >200 cm)
Suitability factors classification, score and sources
The three tables below describe the classification scheme used per suitability factors, how the classified suitability factors are grouped into suitability score bins, and the sources of the suitability factors.
Suitability component categories scheme
The table below describes the classification scheme used per suitability factors.
Component | Code | Classification |
Soil characteristics (G) | G1 | Sand |
G2 | Alluvium | |
G3 | Heavy saline soil and saline soil under mangroves | |
G4 | Low and medium saline soil | |
G5 | Potential acid sulphate soil (low active salinity) (0-50 cm) | |
G6 | Potential acid sulphate soil (high active salinity > 50 cm) | |
G7 | Potential acid sulphate soils (low active 0-50cm) | |
G8 | Potential acid sulphate soils (high active > 50cm) | |
G9 | Acrisol | |
G10 | Peat soil | |
G11 | Ferralsols | |
G12 | Others | |
G13 | Raised bed soil | |
Inundation depth caused by flood with 10% probability (F) | F1 | Not flooded |
F2 | Low (< 50cm) | |
F3 | Medium (50 - 100 cm) | |
F4 | High (100 - 200 cm) | |
F5 | Extremely high (> 200 cm) | |
Flood control conditions (I) | I1 | Not flooded |
I2 | Full flood prevention (with high dike system) | |
I3 | Semi flood prevention system (with a low dike system) | |
Salinisation: Salinity intrusion caused by low flow event with 85% exceedance probability (Sa) | Sa1 | No salinity intrusion (concentration < 1g/l for duration < 1 month) |
Sa2 | Salinity intrusion from 1 g/l to 4 g/l for duration 1 - 3 months | |
Sa3 | Salinity intrusion with concentration of 4 g/l to 10 g/l for duration 4-6 months | |
Sa4 | Salinity intrusion with concentration of 10 g/l for duration > 6 months |
Suitability scoring scheme
The table below describes the scoring used per suitability factor.
Flood-based Agriculture type | Natural indicators | Highly Suitable | Moderately Suitable | Marginally Suitable | Not suitable |
Crop/Rice & Prawn (Giant freshwater prawn | Soil (G) | G2, G4, G6, G8, G9, G5, G7, G10 | G1, G3, G11, G12, G13 | ||
Flood depth (F) | F4 | F3, F5 | F2 | F1 | |
Flood prevention (I) | I3, I2 | I1 | |||
Salinity intrusion (Sa) | Sa1, Sa2 | Sa3, Sa4 | |||
Crop/Rice & Fish | Soil (G) | G2, G4, G6, G8, G9, G5, G7, G10 | G1, G3, G11, G12, G13 | ||
Flood depth (F) | F5, F4 | F3 | F2 | F1 | |
Flood prevention (I) | I2, I3 | I1 | |||
Salinity intrusion (Sa) | Sa1, Sa2 | Sa3, Sa4 | |||
Lotus | Soil (G) | G2, G4, G6, G8, G9, G5, G7, G10 | G1, G3, G11, G12, G13 | ||
Flood depth (F) | F3 | F4 | F5, F2 | F1 | |
Flood prevention (I) | I2, I3 | I1 | |||
Salinity intrusion (Sa) | Sa1, Sa2 | Sa3, Sa4 | |||
Melaleuca forest | Soil (G) | G5, G7, G8, G10, G6, G2, G9 | G1, G3, G4, G11, G12, G13 | ||
Flood depth (F) | F2,F3, F4, F5 | F1 | |||
Flood prevention (I) | I1, I2, I3 | ||||
Salinity intrusion (Sa) | Sa1, Sa2, Sa3, Sa4 |
Suitability components sources
The table below describes the data source per suitability factor.
No. | Data | Data source |
VIETNAM | ||
1 | Dykes | MDIRP, 2022 |
2 | Flood inundation depth | Vietnam Mekong Flood maps, RHDHV Vietnam |
3 | Soil maps | MDIRP, 2022 |
CAMBODIA | ||
1 | Flood inundation | MRC |
2 | Soil maps1 | MRC Planning Atlas, 2011 |
- 1 The soil source map used for Vietnam and the soil source map used for Cambodia have different soil typology systems. To ensure consistency, we have reclassified the Cambodian soil map to match with the soil types utilized in the Vietnamese soil map.